Above: Death Valley. That's me blocking out the scenery.
NEWS 1. On 11-21-15, at the JFK Lancer conference in Dallas, I gave a presentation on the fingerprint evidence linking Lee Harvey Oswald to the assassination of President Kennedy. A slightly edited version of this presentation is included below. There is a lot to digest, but I believe you will find this presentation both illuminating and infuriating. You can read it at your own pace by clicking on the right arrow. Enjoy.NEWS 2: On September 27, 2014, I spoke on the single-bullet theory at a conference in Bethesda, Maryland timed to correspond to the 50th anniversary of the Warren Report. The list of speakers included Oswald's friend Buell Wesley Frazier, participants in official investigations such as Dr. Cyril Wecht, Prof. Robert Blakey, and Robert Groden, and journalists and authors such as Russ Baker, Jefferson Morley, and Anthony Summers. The conference was presented by the Assassination Archives and Research Center. Anti-Castro Cuban Antonio Veciana finally confirmed that his CIA handler, Maurice Bishop--the one he claimed to see with Oswald--was in fact David Atlee Phillips, a high-ranking CIA officer whose appearance and personal history matched up perfectly with Veciana's description of Bishop. History was made. Videos of these presentations are now available online, here: http://aarclibrary.org/aarc-2014-conference-videos/
There was a problem with my video, however. The slides were inserted out of sync with my discussion. Rather than wait for this to be resolved (because it probably never will be) I went ahead and made a movie in which the slides are presented rapid fire, but where the viewer can pause and read each slide if they wish. This is available here:
If this screen should prove too small, moreover, one can view the video in theater mode, here:
NEWS 3: On 10-17-13, as part of the Passing the Torch Conference put on by the Cyril Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, I gave a presentation at Duquesne University. My presentation dealt chiefly with Kennedy's head wounds. Unfortunately, my presentation was scheduled to coincide with Dr. Wecht's own presentation, across campus, and during a rainstorm. As a result, many of those who wanted to attend my presentation, were unable to make it. As a consequence, then, I created the following "letter," which I supplied to a doctor who missed the presentation. This "letter" explains the logic behind one of my key findings, namely, that the supposed exit on the top of Kennedy's head was actually a tangential wound of both entrance and exit. Press the right arrow and read. (Note: this material is covered in more detail in chapters 16-18b of my online book, below.)
Chapters 2 and 2b explore the early investigations performed by both the FBI and Secret Service, and demonstrate their utter failure to establish as simple a matter as which shots hit the President, and where he was when hit.
Chapters 5-9b present a comprehensive study of the eyewitness statements regarding the shooting of the President, and demonstrate, beyond any real doubt, that the single-assassin scenario currently in favor is a ridiculous fabrication.
Chapter 18d: Reason to Believe
Chapters 19 and 20 discuss the roadblocks to progress in assassination "research" and explore some continuing mysteries.
Chapter 19b: Stuck in the Middle with You
Chapter 19c: Mr. Holland's Colossal Blunder
Chapter 19d: Lost in the Jungle with Kurtz
Chapter 21 discusses my most recent thoughts on the assassination
Chapter 21: Rorschach Test
Here is a blog on which I tracked the media's response to the 50th anniversary of the assassination:
The Onslaught: the Media's Response to the 50th Anniversary of the JFK Assassination
The Onslaught, Part2
Here is a quick list reflecting my current thoughts on the assassination, that is, why I remain a "conspiracy theorist" even though I feel certain much of what has been proposed by the "research community" is nonsense: Fun With Lists: a Quick Look at the Evidence
Here is a blog in which I discussed Vincent Bugliosi's book Reclaiming History: Reclaiming History from Reclaiming History